Evidence mapPaperPMID 41312243Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Quality and reliability of Chinese short videos on TikTok related to chronic renal failure: cross-sectional study.

Kai Wang, Xianjiao Tan, Pei Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai WangDepartment of Information, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xianjiao TanDepartment of Information, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Pei LiuDepartment of Information, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic renal failure is projected to be one of the fastest-growing causes of death among non-communicable diseases by 2040. TikTok has emerged as a major platform for disseminating health-related videos. However, the reliability and quality of Chinese videos related to chronic renal failure on TikTok remain unclear. We systematically searched and screened videos related to chronic renal failure from the Chinese version of TikTok. Two independent raters assessed the reliability and quality of the videos using two validated evaluation tools: the DISCERN instrument and the Global Quality Score (GQS). Moreover, the correlation between the reliability and quality of the videos and their characteristics (duration, likes, comments, shares, and number of followers) was further investigated. Results: After searching and screening, a total of 78 eligible videos were ultimately included for analysis. According to their sources, 94.87% were uploaded by medical professionals. The median DISCERN and GQS scores were 39 (IQR 37-46.25) and 3 (IQR 2.75-4), respectively, indicating that videos related to chronic renal failure on TikTok were unreliable and of mediocre quality, mainly at poor (42.31%) and moderate (44.87%) categories. The reliability and quality of the videos were positively correlated with video duration (

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicVideo RecordingChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of Resultschronic renal failurecontent analysisDISCERN toolGlobal Quality Scorehealth information qualityonline health informationTikTokvideo quality

Identifiers

PMID41312243
PMCPMC12646988

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.