ReviewAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Cognition and coronary events: A narrative overview of neurocognitive impairment in ACS patients.
Review in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurocognitive dysfunction is a common but often overlooked complication in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence on the prevalence, mechanisms, clinical assessment, and management strategies of cognitive impairment in ACS patients. We highlight how neurocognitive deficits including memory loss, reduced attention, and executive dysfunction arise from cerebral hypoperfusion, systemic inflammation, microvascular injury, and post-infarct metabolic stress. These deficits arise from mechanisms including cerebral hypoperfusion, systemic inflammation, microvascular injury, and post-infarct metabolic stress. Such impairments are associated with poorer clinical outcomes, decreased treatment adherence, and increased mortality. Routine cognitive assessment remains absent from standard ACS management, despite the availability of effective tools such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which can detect subtle cognitive deficits early in hospitalization. Integrating cognitive screening into clinical protocols enables timely interventions and better patient stratification. Management strategies should combine pharmacological treatment of cardiovascular risk factors with non-pharmacological interventions such as cognitive rehabilitation, mental health support, and lifestyle modification. Multidisciplinary collaboration between cardiology, neurology, psychology, and rehabilitation specialists is essential to address both cardiac and cognitive recovery. By integrating findings from clinical and epidemiological studies, this review underscores the need for routine cognitive screening, multidisciplinary care, and innovative interventions such as telemedicine to improve patient outcomes. Recognizing cognitive health as an integral part of ACS management offers a more holistic, patient-centered approach to recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.