Evidence mapPaperPMID 41312957Full record

ReviewArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2025

Cardio-kidney-metabolic (CKM) framework: A nephrologist's perspective.

Ana Flavia Moura, Roberto Pecoits-Filho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana Flavia MouraEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Salvador, BA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-7368-4704
Roberto Pecoits-FilhoClinEpi Program, Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0255-6710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recently proposed cardio-kidney-metabolic (CKM) framework underscores the interconnected nature of cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic diseases and represents an important step toward preventive, integrated care. However, its application in kidney care remains limited and dependent on additional supportive evidence. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often underrecognized in cardiovascular risk models and receives delayed attention within the CKM pathway. Nephrologists face unique challenges - including workforce shortages, late referrals, and fragmented care systems - particularly in lowand middleincome countries. Early detection is further hindered by the lack of CKD-specific risk assessment tools and limited access to essential diagnostics and therapies. Real-world data from global and national studies highlight substantial implementation gaps, suboptimal outcomes, and the heavy economic burden of delayed CKD management. Importantly, as emphasized by the American Heart Association, implementation of the CKM approach is still under construction and must remain data-driven, ensuring that strategies are grounded in robust evidence. This review offers a nephrology-oriented perspective on the CKM framework, emphasizing the bidirectional relationship between CKD and other CKM components, the prognostic implications of delayed diagnosis, and the need for improved multidisciplinary coordination.

Indexed as

Cardio-Renal SyndromeCardiovascular DiseasesNephrologistsNephrologyRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHumansCardio-kidney-metabolic syndromecardiovascular diseasechronic kidney diseasediabetesobesity

Identifiers

PMID41312957
PMCPMC12671337

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.