Evidence mapPaperPMID 41313497Full record

SynthesisCurrent psychiatry reports2025

Digital Health Interventions for Perinatal Depression in Diverse Cultural Contexts: a Systematic Review.

Neve Davison, Ritika Behl, Yeji Baek, Thach Tran, Jane Fisher

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current psychiatry reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neve DavisonGlobal and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Ritika BehlSchool of Legal Studies and Governance, Vidyashilp University, Bengaluru, India.
Yeji BaekGlobal and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Thach TranGlobal and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jane FisherGlobal and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. jane.fisher@monash.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review examines the evidence on the effectiveness of digital health interventions delivered in culturally diverse settings systematically. Following PRISMA guidelines, the review reports on the features and elements of digital interventions for perinatal depression designed and delivered in culturally diverse or resource-constrained settings. A search of the most current literature (2022 - ) was conducted in May 2025 of six databases from psychology, medicine and digital health fields. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute randomised controlled trial and quasi-experimental checklists.

findingsA total of 23 randomised controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in ten countries and employed diverse digital health interventions. Most interventions were either application or telehealth designs, with delivery starting during pregnancy and lasting for between 6 and 8 weeks. The quality of studies and reporting varied, with the lowest quality studies (n = 3) scoring ‘yes’ to less than half the items included in the quality appraisal checklists. There is growing evidence on the effectiveness of digital health interventions to prevent, identify or treat perinatal depression in diverse cultural contexts. Research into perinatal depression digital interventions is expanding rapidly as interest in and the benefits of digital interventions is understood better. Despite this, continued research on the accessibility and feasibility of these interventions in culturally diverse and low-resourced contexts is warranted.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityDepression, PostpartumPregnancy ComplicationsDigital HealthDigital MediaFemaleHumansPerinatal CarePregnancyTelemedicineDigital healthLow-and-middle income countiesPerinatal depressionPostpartumPregnancy

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.