ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2025
Utility of in Vivo and Ex-vivo Models in Food Allergy Research: Lessons for Shrimp Allergy.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The AhR-TLR4 axis in non-IgE-mediated Cow's milk allergy: a systematic review with integrated multi-omics corroboration.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Editorial: Allergen cross-reactivity - a challenge in daily practice.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We are living in an era where food allergy is increasingly prevalent, and shrimp allergy (SA) is among the most common and potentially severe reactions worldwide. Significant efforts have been made to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment options. However, diagnosing SA remains challenging due to its diverse clinical presentations and the complexity of shrimp allergens. The pathogenesis of SA is complicated by various allergens sensitization, epithelial barrier disruption and gut microbiota dysbiosis. To date, at least ten shrimp allergens have been identified, but sensitization profiles vary significantly across populations. Promising novel immunotherapy approaches have been explored, showing potential in murine models. The use of physiologically relevant experimental systems, from in vivo models (e.g., murine studies) to advanced ex vivo human-based techniques (including organoids, organ-on-a-chip platforms, and tissue slice cultures), offers promising alternative for studying biological processes that are difficult to investigate directly in humans. These models have emerged as a valuable tool in food allergy research by providing critical insights into food-gut interactions, gut microbiota-host dynamics epithelial barrier integrity and cross-talk between epithelia and immune cells, and signaling and inflammatory markers. This review aims to summarize recent advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of SA, and the potential in vivo/ex-vivo models in SA research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41313508What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.