Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41313519›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

Machine learning-based models for predicting glioma-associated epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Parmida Shirzadi, Salem M Tos, Azin Ebrahimi, Rana Hashemi, Dorsa Najari, Fatemeh Ghorbanpouryami, Ehsan Bahrami Hezaveh, Mohammad Amin Habibi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bardia HajikarimlooDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. bardii47@yahoo.com.
Ibrahim MohammadzadehSkull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parmida ShirzadiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Salem M TosDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Azin EbrahimiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rana HashemiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dorsa NajariDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh GhorbanpouryamiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ehsan Bahrami HezavehDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Amin HabibiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioma-associated epilepsy (GAE) is a common and disabling complication in glioma patients. Predicting seizures in this population is challenging due to complex tumor-host interactions. With recent advancements in machine learning (ML) models, these models can incorporate high-dimensional datasets and detect subtle patterns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of ML-based models for predicting GAE.

methodsA comprehensive review was performed following PRISMA guidelines in four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) on May 23, 2025. Studies developing ML-based models for GAE prediction were included. Pooled estimates for area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated.

resultsThirteen studies with 3,253 patients were included. Pooled AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.91), and ACC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76-0.88). The pooled SEN was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87), SPE was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-0.96), and DOR was 40.1 (95% CI: 17.1-94.0). The Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve demonstrated a false positive rate of 0.09.

conclusionML-based models demonstrate encouraging diagnostic performance in predicting GAE. Incorporating these models into daily clinical practice can help physicians with risk stratification and the identification of high-risk individuals, thereby optimizing therapeutic strategies and enhancing patient outcomes. Before implementing these models in real-time clinical practice, several limitations, including a lack of standardized protocols, considerable heterogeneity among models, and a lack of external validation, should be addressed.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEpilepsyGliomaMachine learningPredictionRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41313519
PMCPMC12662925

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.