Observational studyJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026
Contrast-Enhanced MR Fingerprinting With Delta-Relaxometry: Investigating a New Avenue for Tumor Characterization.
Observational study in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMRI contrast agents enhance lesion characterization by altering tissue relaxation properties. However, quantitative assessment of contrast enhancement is limited by variability in contrast administration parameters, and lack of efficient and precise contrast concentration independent relaxivity (r PURPOSE: To introduce an MRF-derived delta-relaxometry method for mapping contrast-specific relaxivity ratios (r STUDY TYPE: Prospective, observational. POPULATION: Phantom studies and 29 patients (15 glioblastoma, 14 brain metastases). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T; pre- and post-contrast 3D whole-brain MR Fingerprinting. ASSESSMENT: Mathematical derivations established a relationship between ΔR STATISTICAL TEST: Coefficient of variation; coefficient of determination; Mann-Whitney U tests with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.
resultsΔR EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 (retrospective cohort study with imperfectly applied reference standard). TECHNOLOGY EFFICACY: 1 (feasibility study with quantitative assessment, requires a comparison with standard of care).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.