ReviewThe FEBS journal2026
Therapeutic potential of inhibitors of gelatinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 for the treatment of breast cancer.
Review in The FEBS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-criteria decision analysis of dendrimer applications in drug delivery systems.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2026Article
- Retinoic acid in health and disease.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in Psoriasis: Integrating Extracellular Matrix Remodeling, Neutrophil-Endothelial Crosstalk and Biomarker Evidence.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrated Experimental and In-Silico Analysis Indicates Melittin as a Modulator of IL-37a-Associated Networks in Neuroblastoma.The protein journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Association of MMP-2 and hematological parameters with breast cancer metastasis: a cross-sectional study in Central Java, Indonesia.Oncology reviews · 2026Article
- SMP30: a promising cancer biomarker with therapeutic potential.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are secreted and cell membrane-associated enzymes that remodel the extracellular matrix (ECM) and cleave extracellular proteins to promote tumor invasion, angiogenesis, immune evasion, and many other aspects of cancer progression. Among this family, the gelatinases MMP-2 and MMP-9, specialized for cleaving collagen IV, are tightly linked to metastatic progression in breast cancer and adverse clinical outcomes. Here, we summarize gelatinase biochemistry and regulation, including zymogen activation, TIMP control, cell-surface trafficking and tethering, and receptor-mediated clearance, and explain how crosstalk between ECM and proteases amplifies invasion and metastatic seeding. We then review therapeutic strategies in two parts: direct inhibition and indirect pathway modulation. Direct approaches emphasize selective small molecules (thiirane mechanism-based inhibitors, allosteric blockers of pro-MMP-9 activation) and protein biologics (monoclonal antibodies, nanobodies, engineered TIMPs). Indirect strategies target upstream signals that drive MMP-2/-9, including MAPK/AP-1, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, NF-κB, EGFR/JAK/STAT, and nuclear receptor and Nrf2/HO-1 programs, with agents that curb invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis in breast cancer models. Together, these advances define a maturing toolkit for precise gelatinase control and support prospective evaluation in rational combinations to restrain metastatic progression in high-risk breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.