ArticleBMJ open2025
Clinical and behavioural correlates of early diabetic foot ulcer risk at Jimma Medical Center, Ethiopia: application of Inlow's 60-Second Screening Tool in a resource-constrained setting.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the early risk of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) among adult patients with diabetes and to identify clinical and behavioural correlates associated with DFU risk using Inlow's 60-Second Screening Tool.
designA cross-sectional analytical study.
settingConducted at a tertiary-level referral hospital in Southwest Ethiopia.
participantsThe study included 164 adult patients with diabetes (aged ≥18 years) who attended routine follow-up visits at the diabetic clinic between February and March 2025. Patients who were critically ill, unable to communicate during data collection or pregnant were excluded. The median age of participants was 55 years (IQR 46-60), and 54.9% were male. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was early DFU risk, categorised as 'at risk' or 'not at risk' using Inlow's 60-Second Screening Tool. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with DFU risk, such as glycaemic control, lipid profile and foot care practices.
resultsOf the 164 participants, 32.3% (n=53) were found to be at risk for DFU. Participants who performed foot self-checks infrequently had more than threefold higher odds of DFU risk compared with those who practiced daily foot care (adjusted OR (AOR)=3.35; 95% CI 1.48 to 7.58; p=0.004). Poor glycaemic control (AOR=2.39; 95% CI 1.03 to 5.55; p=0.042) and dyslipidaemia (AOR=2.63; 95% CI 1.18 to 5.85; p=0.018) were also significantly associated with increased DFU risk.
conclusionsNearly one-third of patients with diabetes in this Ethiopian hospital setting were at early risk for DFU. Factors such as inadequate foot care, poor glycaemic control and dyslipidaemia were associated with increased risk. Incorporating rapid foot screening tools like Inlow's 60-Second assessment into routine diabetes care, together with strengthened patient education and metabolic management, may help reduce the risk of DFU in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.