ArticleBMJ open2025
Heterogeneity of self-regulatory fatigue in patients with coronary heart disease in China: a latent profile and associated factors analysis from a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSelf-regulatory fatigue (SRF) is a common psychological issue among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, research on the heterogeneity of SRF in this patient population is currently very limited, which hinders the implementation of precision-oriented nursing interventions. This study aimed to explore potential subgroups of SRF in patients with CHD and identify associated factors.
designCross-sectional survey.
settingTwo tertiary Grade A hospitals in Daqing City, Heilongjiang Province, China.
participantsA convenience sample of 339 patients with CHD.
resultsLatent profile analysis identified four distinct SRF subgroups: Low SRF group (28.4%), Moderate SRF-poor behavioural regulation group (23.6%), Moderate SRF-poor emotional regulation group (27.4%) and High SRF group (20.6%). Multivariate logistic regression showed that age, duration of CHD and illness perception were commonly associated factors for SRF across all groups; frequency of use of medications and experiential avoidance were associated factors for the Moderate SRF-poor behavioural regulation group; female gender was an associated factor for the Moderate SRF-poor emotional regulation group; hope and experiential avoidance were associated factors for the High SRF group.
conclusionPatients with CHD exhibit four distinct SRF subgroups. Healthcare providers can use these findings to identify patients with varying SRF profiles early and implement targeted, subgroup-specific interventions to alleviate SRF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.