ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Analysis of Cryoprotectant Concentration During Cryopreservation in Articular Cartilage Sample Using Homogeneous and Porous Material Models.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study examines the concentration of cryoprotectant (CPA) in an articular cartilage sample during cryopreservation by computing the effective diffusion coefficient using different material models-homogeneous and porous.
methodsThe mass transfer phenomenon is coupled to the effective diffusion coefficient, which is determined by three different approaches. The first and second models, based on the Einstein-Stokes equation and the Arrhenius expression, respectively, treat the sample as a homogeneous material, whilst the third considers it as a porous medium. The effective diffusion coefficient is additionally weakly coupled to the heat transfer phenomenon described by the Fourier equation, and the third variant is also strongly coupled to the concentration of CPA.
resultsThe final section of the article presents example calculations for the selected cryopreservation method, and the results are compared with the experimental results. Depending on the method applied to estimate the effective diffusion coefficient, the maximal relative errors in relation to experimental results are equal to 15.82%, 5.20%, and 24.96%, respectively.
conclusionA decrease in temperature and an increase in the concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) cause a reduction of the effective diffusion coefficient. Moreover, in the model considering the porosity of the sample, the lowest values of the effective diffusion coefficient were obtained. This study's novelty lies in its comparative analysis of homogeneous and porous models, as well as its explicit coupling of temperature, concentration, and diffusion processes during cryopreservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.