Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315366›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Building a DNA barcode library of commercially exploited fish genetic resources (FGR) of the Gomti River, Ganga basin, implications for conservation and management.

Ashish Sahu, Mahender Singh, Uttam Kumar Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashish SahuICAR- National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow, 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9690-786X
Mahender SinghICAR- National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow, 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India. dr.mahendersingh29@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-5460
Uttam Kumar SarkarICAR- National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow, 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8166-4375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Gomti River is a vital tributary of the largest Gangetic Riverine system, flowing in the northern part of Uttar Pradesh, India. This habitat serves as one of India's most precious repository for fish genetic resources (FGR), contributing significantly to regional biodiversity, and is a source of livelihood. It has diverse climatic conditions, which have led to a distinctive fish community structure and the presence of native species. The application of DNA barcoding for assessing FGR in the north Himalayan region, particularly in UP, presents a notable research gap. This study established the first DNA barcodes of voucher specimens identified through classical taxonomy, creating a molecular catalogue of commercially important fish species. DNA barcoding was accomplished using the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (COI) for species identification and phylogenetic analysis. We identified 37 commercially important fish species (34 native & 3 exotics) using classical taxonomy and molecular biology, which belonged to 8 orders, 18 families, and 29 genera. The IUCN conservation status revealed that 30 species (81.08%) were categorized as Least Concern (LC), followed by 4 species (10.81%) as Near Threatened (NT), 2 species (5.41%) as Vulnerable (VU), and 1 species (2.70%) as Endangered (EN). Cypriniformes order and Cyprinidae family emerged as the most dominant groups, contributing 40.54% and 29.73%, respectively. Average read lengths of all sequences were 630.82 bp (range 578-655 bp). Overall nucleotide composition of Adenine (A) = 25.81%, Thymine (T) = 28.88%, Cytosine (C) = 27.53%, and Guanine (G) = 17.78%. Average GC content (54.69%) was higher than AT content (45.31%). As expected, the uncorrected p-genetic distances showed a progressive increase in genetic divergence from lower to higher taxonomic levels. p-distance values ranged from 0-0.48% (mean 0.06%) within species, 0-11.37% (1.56%) within genera, 0-12.27% (5.00%) within families, and 0-15.31% (8.88%) within orders. Among families, Cyprinidae (12.27%) and Danionidae (11.57%) exhibited the highest genetic divergence. Whereas at the order level, the greatest divergence was observed in Perciformes (15.31%), followed by Siluriformes (15.22%). The constructed phylogenetic tree shows that all species are clearly separated based on similar groups and clustered into independent clades. Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) analysis identified ten partitions with the best ASAP score (4.00). It reveals a barcode gap of 1-9% (0.01-0.09) and delimits approximately 31-37 putative fish species. The GTR + G + I model revealed a strong transition bias in the COI gene of the barcoded fishes, with higher pyrimidine substitutions and transition/transversion ratios (k₁ = 10.80; k₂ = 26.98; R = 3.09). Our dataset comprised 110 COI nucleotide sequences with 592 positions in the final alignment, including 236 polymorphic sites and 39 distinct haplotypes. We also estimated haplotype diversity (Hd = 0.975) and nucleotide diversity (π = 0.194). Our findings highlighted that efficacy of traditional taxonomy and DNA barcoding method (also known as integrative taxonomy) is complementary to each other for identifying and authenticating fish taxa. Additionally, the developed COI library will be valuable for future environmental DNA (eDNA) studies for detecting indigenous and exotic fish species and useful for nature conservation. We conclude that it serves as an effective tool for sustainable conservation, fishery management, and future monitoring of freshwater fish genetic resources.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFishesGene LibraryAnimalsBiodiversityElectron Transport Complex IVIndiaPhylogenyRiversElectron Transport Complex IVCOI geneDNA BarcodingFish diversityGomti RiverPhylogenetic analysisTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID41315366
PMCPMC12663566

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.