ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-strategy improved lemur optimiser for global optimisation and engineering applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this research, a highly effective population evolution-based multi-strategy improved lemur optimiser (MILO) algorithm is proposed to tackle the flaws of the existing lemur optimiser (LO) algorithm, including issues like slow convergence and an imbalanced strategy for exploration and exploitation. First, Chebyshev chaotic mapping is employed to heighten the diversity and optimisation efficiency of the initial population. Second, to avert the algorithm from converging to local optima, a multielite-guided differential population evolution strategy is proposed. Finally, the algorithm integrates longitudinal and transversal crossover strategies to enable comprehensive solution space exploration, thereby enhancing the convergence accuracy in later evolutionary stages. To evaluate the performance of MILO, simulation experiments are conducted using the CEC2005, the CEC2017, and the CEC2022 function set, demonstrating that MILO outperforms eleven well-established swarm intelligence optimisers, especially in terms of solution accuracy and stability. Additionally, compared with the original algorithm, the MILO improves the solution accuracy rate by 19.56%, 25.79%, and 45.73% in the optimisation of three typical engineering design problems. MILO can effectively solve complex multi-objective problems and holds potential for application in intricate real-world optimisation problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.