ArticlePediatric research2025
Social epidemiology of multidimensional sleep health in early adolescence.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sleep problems and emotional and behavioral problems among adolescents: examining independent types, cumulative scores, and latent patterns.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Article
- Sleep, Emotion, and Sex-Specific Developmental Trajectories in Childhood and Adolescence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPoor sleep health is a significant concern in adolescents. This study examines the social epidemiology of sleep health in a large, diverse, national US sample of early adolescents.
methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional data from Year 3 (2019-2021) of the US Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study to examine adjusted associations between sociodemographic factors and sleep duration, sleep efficiency (percentage of time asleep while in bed), chronotype (midpoint of sleep on free days), and social jet lag (difference in sleep onset between free and school days) using multiple linear regression models. Sleep metrics were derived from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire. Interaction with race/ethnicity and sleep outcomes by household income and parental education was evaluated.
resultsAmong 10,082 adolescents (mean age 12.9 ± 0.7), average sleep duration was 8.9 (±1.5) hours, chronotype was 28.3 (midpoint 4:13 a.m.), and social jet lag was 2.3 h. Older age was associated with shorter sleep duration, later chronotype, and greater social jet lag. Gay/bisexual adolescents reported shorter sleep duration, later chronotype, and greater social jet lag. Black, Latino/Hispanic, and Native American adolescents generally had poorer sleep outcomes. Lower-income households were associated with shorter sleep duration and greater social jet lag. Black race and worse sleep outcomes were more strongly associated among higher-income/parental education households.
conclusionSociodemographic disparities in adolescent sleep call for targeted interventions to promote healthier sleep. IMPACT: Sociodemographic disparities in adolescent sleep health outcomes have been studied, but few have explored associations with multidimensional sleep metrics. US early adolescents reported an average sleep duration of 8.9 h, with 50.5% of 11-12-year-olds and 61.0% of 13-14-year-olds meeting the American Academy of Sleep Medicine's sleep guidelines. Older age, gay/bisexual, Black, Latino/Hispanic, Native American, lower household income, and lower parental education were associated with worse sleep outcomes, including shorter sleep duration, later chronotype, and greater social jet lag. The association between Black race and worse sleep outcomes was stronger among higher-income/parental education households.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.