ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep neural networks and deep deterministic policy gradient for early ASD diagnosis and personalized intervention in children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis and personalized intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in children can potentially improve developmental outcomes, though current methods often lack scalability and adaptability. This study introduces an integrated system combining a deep neural network (DNN) and a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) reinforcement learning framework for early ASD detection and adaptive psychosocial intervention. The DNN, trained and validated on diverse datasets spanning toddlers to adolescents (sourced from the University of Arkansas, Vaishnavi Sirigiri, and Afarin Bargrizan), achieved a predictive accuracy of 96.98% with precision (97.65%), recall (96.74%), and ROC AUC (99.75%) on the test sets, demonstrating superior performance compared to traditional models like Random Forest and Logistic Regression. Key features, such as Qchat-10-Score and ethnicity, were identified using multi-strategy selection (LASSO, Random Forest). Building on these predictions, the DDPG-based intervention system simulated personalized strategies over 12 monthly cycles using virtual data to optimize intervention type, frequency, and intensity, resulting in observed improvements of up to 25% in social skills, up to 30% reduction in behavioral issues, and up to 20% improvement in emotional stability, with a reduction in high-risk ASD cases from 65 to 25% in the simulated cohort. This system offers a promising, data-driven approach to ASD management, enhancing early screening and tailoring interventions to individual needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.