Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315923›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of headache and pain2025

Atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies failure in migraine: a multicenter real-world study of effectiveness, safety, persistence and predictors of response.

Albert Muñoz-Vendrell, Sergio Campoy-Díaz, Paloma Valín-Villanueva, Javier Casas-Limón, Iris Fernández-Lázaro, Nuria González-García, Sonia Santos-Lasaosa, Yésica González Osorio, Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez, Jaume Campdelacreu and 22 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Albert Muñoz-VendrellHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. amunoz@bellvitgehospital.cat.
Sergio Campoy-DíazHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Paloma Valín-VillanuevaHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier Casas-LimónHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Iris Fernández-LázaroHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Nuria González-GarcíaHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Sonia Santos-LasaosaUniversidad de Zaragoza, IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.
Yésica González OsorioHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid Biosanitary Research Institute (IBIoVALL), Valladolid, Spain.
Alicia Gonzalez-MartinezHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid Biosanitary Research Institute (IBIoVALL), Valladolid, Spain.
Jaume CampdelacreuHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Leonardo Portocarrero-SánchezHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, La Paz University Hospital and Institute for Health Research - IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), Madrid, Spain.
Luis Miguel Cano SánchezNeurology Department, Hospital Sant Joan Despí, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain.
Sonia María García SánchezNeurology Department, Hospital Sant Joan Despí, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain.
Alba Pérez-de-la-ParteHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Noemí Morollón Sánchez-MateosHeadache and Neuralgia Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Alba López-BravoNeurology Department, Hospital Reina Sofia, Tudela, Navarra, Spain.
Ane Mínguez-OlaondoNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Antonio Sánchez-SoblecheroHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Alberto Lozano RosHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Cristian Morales HernándezNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Alberto Andrés LópezHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Almudena Layos-RomeroHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Edoardo CaronnaHeadache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Torres-FerrúsHeadache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Alicia AlpuenteHeadache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Patricia Pozo-RosichHeadache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Robert BelvísHeadache and Neuralgia Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
David Garcia-AzorinHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Javier Díaz-de-TeránHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, La Paz University Hospital and Institute for Health Research - IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), Madrid, Spain.
Ángel Luis Guerrero-PeralHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid Biosanitary Research Institute (IBIoVALL), Valladolid, Spain.
Ana Beatriz Gago-VeigaHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Mariano Huerta-VillanuevaHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtogepant is approved for migraine prevention and has shown strong efficacy in clinical trials. However, its effectiveness following failure of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) has not been evaluated in large real-world populations.

methodsThis multicenter observational study conducted across Spanish headache units included adults with migraine who initiated atogepant after failure of ≥ 1 anti-CGRP MAb and had ≥ 3 months of follow-up. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were collected prospectively, with follow-up assessments at months 3 and 6. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) at three months. Secondary outcomes included ≥ 30%, ≥ 75%, and 100% response rates; changes in headache days, pain intensity, acute medication use, and patient-reported outcomes; adverse events; treatment persistence; and factors associated with response.

resultsA total of 252 patients were included (mean age 48.9 ± 12 years; 83.3% female; 80.6% with chronic migraine; 45.6% with continuous daily headache). Prior to atogepant, 39.7% had failed one anti-CGRP MAb, 27.0% two, 20.2% three, and 13.1% four. Median baseline MMD was 16, monthly headache days 27, and acute medication days 20. At 3 months, 44.4% achieved a ≥ 30% reduction in MMD, 29.7% ≥50%, and 11.7% ≥75%. Adverse events were reported in 52.5% of patients, most commonly constipation (30%) and nausea (25%). At three months, 26.2% had discontinued treatment (65.1% due to inefficacy, 28.8% due to intolerance). Treatment persistence at 180 days was 61% (95% CI 54 to 69%). A higher number of previously failed MAbs was independently associated with reduced odds of ≥ 50% response (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97). Moreover, a higher number of previously failed MAbs was associated with diminished improvements across multiple clinical endpoints, including headache frequency, intensity, acute medication use, and disability measures.

conclusionAtogepant may represent a viable treatment option for patients with migraine who have failed anti-CGRP MAbs. In this large real-world cohort, approximately one-third of patients achieved a ≥ 50% response, despite a treatment-refractory profile. However, the likelihood of response decreases with a higher number of previously failed MAbs, and mild adverse events are frequent.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideMigraine DisordersAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideAnti-CGRP monoclonal antibodiesAtogepantMigraineReal-worldTreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID41315923
PMCPMC12764079

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.