ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Integrative genomic and machine learning approaches reveal evolutionary signatures in the winged bean mitochondrial genome.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chloroplast genome sequencing in winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus L.) and comparative analysis with other legumes.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mitochondrial genome of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (winged bean), a nutritionally valuable yet genomically underexplored tropical legume, was assembled using high-coverage PacBio long reads and Illumina short reads. The 366,925 bp circular genome encodes 64 genes (38 protein-coding, 20 tRNAs, 6 rRNAs) and contains nine fragmented protein-coding genes, indicative of dynamic mitogenome architecture. Repeat profiling revealed 100 dispersed repeats (30-110 bp) and 25 SSRs (4.95% of the genome), with assembly graph inspection and recombination models supporting subgenomic circles and isoforms. Comparative analyses across 15 legumes showed pervasive purifying selection, with positive selection in specific codons of atp4, ccmB, cox1, nad3, and rps10. Codon usage analyses showed that mitochondrial genes exhibit moderate bias largely shaped by mutational pressure, whereas chloroplast genes display stronger selective constraints. Synteny mapping revealed multiple conserved and inverted regions between organelles, highlighting structural divergence. To bridge structural and compositional insights, we developed a novel machine learning framework trained on 14 codon bias features that discriminate organelle origin with upto 0.96 AUC, identifying GC3s as the most informative predictor. This represents the first ML-based classification of plant organelle genomes and demonstrate that codon composition encodes an evolutionarily conserved "organelle signatures". This approach not only elucidates the evolutionary architecture of P. tetragonolobus mitogenome but also establishes a transferable model for organelle genome classification and comparative analysis across plants and other eukaryotic lineages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.