ArticleBMC public health2025
Data science and artificial intelligence for maternal, newborn and child health: scoping review and thematic analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn 2020, an estimated 287,000 women died in pregnancy or childbirth-related causes (70% in Africa), while 2.3 million newborns died in the first 28 days of life in 2022 (46% in Africa). The utility of data science and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in health has potential to contribute and accelerate innovation, improve data use for evidence-based decision making, and better planning for policy decision making.
aimTo map the current landscape of data science and artificial intelligence applications in maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) across Africa and identify gaps, challenges, and opportunities for future implementation.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework across five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Ovid) and grey literature published before December 2023. Thematic analysis was conducted using previously published seven-domain framework to identify patterns in data science applications, challenges and opportunities. Additionally, projects within the maternal newborn and child health focus on the WHO's Digital Health Initiatives Atlas were reviewed.
resultsOf 11,320 articles screened, 52 articles from 31 African countries met inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 34, 65.4%) were from Eastern Africa. Most studies were research projects (n = 28, 53.8%) and demographic health surveys (n = 22, 43.1%) rather than operational implementation government programmes. Key themes identified included infrastructure challenges, data quality issues, limited workforce capacity, and heavy reliance on external funding. The WHO's Digital Health Atlas revealed 659 data science initiatives across Africa with the earliest recorded in 2002. 316 (48%) projects were focussed on MNCH and were implemented in 44 African countries.
conclusionThe limited application of data science and artificial intelligence in MNCH at the national level highlights a significant gap in Africa. Our review found that 28 studies (53.8%) were research projects compared to operational implementations integrated into routine systems to inform policy. Main barriers include inadequate infrastructure, limited data stewardship capacity, and insufficient government commitment. Opportunities exist through Africa's youthful demographics, expanding mobile technology, and latecomer advantage in digital innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.