Evidence mapPaperPMID 41316243Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2025

The effectiveness and safety of a mobile application-based self-regulation intervention to support weight loss among adults living with obesity: a large-scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Paul Doody, Gina M Wren, Sarah Mounsey, Simona Haasova, Cristina Stewart, Stella J P Haffner, Susan A Jebb, Paul Aveyard

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05787652 (An Online Self-regulation Intervention to Support Weight Loss Among Adults Living With Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05787652 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

An Online Self-regulation Intervention to Support Weight Loss Among Adults Living With Obesity: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2023 to 2025Enrolled1,294ConditionsObesityArmsARTEMIS mobile app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul Doody *Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. paul.doody@tcd.ie.
Gina M Wren *Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. gina.wren@phc.ox.ac.uk.
Sarah MounseyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Simona HaasovaNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Cristina StewartNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stella J P HaffnerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Susan A JebbNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Paul AveyardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is a leading risk factor for avoidable ill health. Effective interventions that can be delivered at scale are needed to support people living with excess weight to lose weight.

methodsWe conducted a two-arm randomised controlled trial among adults aged ≥ 18 years living with obesity in the United Kingdom. Participants were recruited via online social media advertisements and allocated 1:1 to receive six months of unlimited access to a purpose-built mobile application based on self-regulation theory (i.e. daily self-weighing, action planning, and weekly reflections), or advice to lose weight. Co-primary outcomes were change in weight and the proportion of participants achieving ≥ 5% weight loss at six months. We also assessed whether the intervention had adverse effects on symptoms of disordered eating. All participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Per-protocol analyses included participants that successfully completed a minimum of one weigh-in and action on at least four separate weeks and had at least one action in their toolbox. Data were analysed using linear mixed effects and analogous logistic models over the six-month period. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05787652.

resultsFrom 13 April to 15 May 2023, 1607 participants were randomly assigned to control (n = 806), or intervention (n = 801). Weight was reported by 632 (39.3%) participants at six months. Mean difference in weight change between groups at six months in intention-to-treat analyses was - 1.85 kg (95% CI: - 2.53, - 1.17, p < 0.001), and the odds of losing ≥ 5% were 2.11 (95% CI: 1.48, 3.03, p < 0.001). Per-protocol analyses showed participants using the app lost an additional - 2.18 kg compared to control, and the odds of losing ≥ 5% were 2.44 (95% CI: 1.67, 3.59, p < 0.001). The proportion of participants scoring above threshold for symptoms of disordered eating declined in intervention relative to control at six months (adjusted OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.91, p = 0.024).

conclusionsAn app with no human contact, designed to foster self-regulatory behaviours, increased weight loss and reduced symptoms of disordered eating in people living with obesity and could be safely deployed at the population level to support effective weight management.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsObesitySelf-ControlWeight LossWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited KingdomMobile applicationObesityRandomised controlled trialSelf-regulationWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID41316243
PMCPMC12771856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.