ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Systemic sclerosis: bridging clinical and molecular insights: results from the PRECISESADS study.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with high mortality driven by multiorgan involvement and limited therapeutic options. Traditional classifications based on skin involvement or serology are insufficient to capture disease complexity or predict outcomes accurately.
methodsK means clustering was applied to clinical and serological data from 402 SSc patients in the PRECISESADS cohort. The resulting clusters were validated in an independent local cohort (n = 213). To explore molecular differences, a random subset of 154 PRECISESADS patients underwent serum proteomic profiling using a panel of 92 organ damage-related proteins. Functional relevance was further investigated by exposing dermal fibroblasts to patient serum and assessing gene expression.
resultsTwo distinct clusters were identified and validated, differing in organ involvement and autoantibody profiles. Cluster 2 was associated with more severe disease, including higher prevalence of ILD, PAH, and musculoskeletal manifestations, and enriched in anti-Scl-70 antibodies. Proteomic analysis revealed upregulation of 26 proteins in Cluster 2, related to fibrosis, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Serum from these patients induced the in vitro expression of pro-fibrotic and inflammatory genes in fibroblasts. Altered levels of several proteins also correlated with relevant clinical features, suggesting potential biomarker utility.
conclusionUnsupervised clustering and proteomic profiling reveal biologically distinct subgroups within SSc, beyond traditional clinical or serological classifications. Our findings support the integration of molecular tools into patient stratification strategies, paving the way toward personalized medicine in SSc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.