ArticleBMC medicine2025
Machine learning-based prediction of short-term outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a multicenter study integrating clinical and inflammatory indicators.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Incident Heart Failure Prediction in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Risk stratification for stroke in acute persistent vertigo: development and internal validation of a multivariable prediction model.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Machine learning models for predicting extended length of stay and hospital charges in nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Early diagnosis and developmental outcome prediction of agenesis of the corpus callosum via an interpretable deep multimodal fusion model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a life-threatening cerebrovascular emergency. We built and validated a machine learning model integrating clinical and inflammatory indicators for early risk prediction.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study included 1,120 aSAH patients admitted between January 2022 and December 2024 across four tertiary hospitals for model development and 326 independent patients from the Second Xiangya Hospital for quasi-external validation. Twenty-eight candidate predictors were evaluated, encompassing clinical grading scales and inflammation- and nutrition-related biomarkers. Continuous variables were discretized into quartile-based categories to enhance interpretability and mitigate outlier effects. Synthetic minority oversampling (SMOTE) addressed outcome imbalance. Feature selection used a two-step process combining the Boruta algorithm and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, with variance inflation factor (VIF) analysis confirming the absence of collinearity. Six supervised algorithms were trained with tenfold cross-validation: logistic regression, neural network, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Model performance was evaluated by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis, and interpretability was assessed with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME).
resultsThe GBM model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.895 (95% CI: 0.856-0.934) in internal validation and 0.864 (95% CI: 0.822-0.906) in quasi-external validation. Nine predictors were retained: procalcitonin, C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), WFNS grade, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and modified Fisher grade. A web-based calculator was implemented for individualized risk prediction.
conclusionsThe GBM-based model enables early prediction of poor short-term outcomes in aSAH, supporting timely clinical decision-making. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted to confirm its generalizability across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.