Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41316706›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2026

Dynamics of excitability in axonal trees.

Laurie D Cohen, Tamar Galateanu, Shimon Marom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laurie D CohenTechnion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York. Electronic address: laurie@campus.technion.ac.il.
Tamar GalateanuTechnion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Shimon MaromTechnion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report that axons of cortical neurons, structurally intricate excitable media, maintain remarkably high fidelity in transmitting somatic spike timing, even during complex spontaneous network activity that includes extremely short (2-3 ms) interspike intervals. This robustness underscores their function as reliable conducting devices under physiological conditions. It is nevertheless well established that under artificially imposed, high-rate pulsing stimuli, axonal conduction can fail, with vulnerability depending on distance and branching. In line with this, we demonstrate that conduction failures can also occur at frequencies as low as 10 Hz, provided that stimulation is sustained for several seconds. Under these conditions, propagation delays increase and failures accumulate, particularly in distal branches, whereas effects are negligible at 1-4 Hz. Simulations incorporating cumulative sodium channel inactivation at vulnerable sites reproduce these dynamics. Our findings refine the view of axons as active, heterogeneous structures: they are exceptionally reliable across most physiological regimes, yet exhibit limits under prolonged or extreme stimulation, a regime that is critical for understanding axonal excitability, especially during sustained drive or in pathological conditions.

Indexed as

AxonsModels, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsNeural Conduction

Identifiers

PMID41316706
PMCPMC12821003

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.