ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Multidimensional sleep health and psychological distress: associations in a Community-Dwelling population.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the association between multidimensional sleep health (MDSH) and psychological distress in Japanese community residents.
methodsA self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted from December 2022 to February 2023 among residents of Kyoto City aged 40 years or older. MDSH was assessed using the RU_SATED, which evaluates six dimensions of sleep health-regularity, satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and duration-and generates a total score. Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler 6 (K6) scale and a single-item question about perceived stress. Associations between sleep health and psychological distress were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.
resultsData from 661 respondents (57.9% female; mean age: 64.9 years; 68.4% urban residents) were analyzed. The prevalence of K6-5 distress, K6-13 distress, and perceived stress was 28.9%, 3.0%, and 20.0%, respectively. K6 scores were negatively correlated with total RU_SATED scores (rs = -0.252, p < 0.001). Each 1-point increase in the RU_SATED score was associated with a 0.325-point decrease in the K6 score. Multivariable logistic regression showed that K6-5 distress was associated with all six RU_SATED dimensions (odds ratios [OR] = 0.309-0.671), while K6-13 distress was associated with satisfaction (OR = 0.176). Perceived stress was associated with regularity, satisfaction, and duration (OR = 0.246-0.653).
conclusionHigher RU_SATED scores were negatively associated with psychological distress, with each sleep dimension showing a distinct relationship. Further research is warranted to examine these associations in more diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41317241What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.