ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2025
Ticked Off: Allergic Effector Cells in the Pathogenesis of Alpha-gal Syndrome.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of alpha-Gal synthesis - a growing risk for alpha Gal syndrome.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Managing Alpha-Gal Allergy in a Case of Bioprosthetic TAVR.Case reports in immunology · 2026Article
- From vector to allergen: exploring the immunology of tick-triggered α-Gal syndrome.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewAlpha-gal syndrome (AGS) is a novel allergic disease characterized by hypersensitivity responses following exposure to the glycan galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal or α-Gal) attached to mammalian proteins and fats in food, supplements, and medications. Bites from hard-bodied ticks, including Amblyomma americanum (Aa or lone star tick) in the United States, have been identified as drivers of allergic sensitization to alpha-gal. Here, we review clinical presentation, epidemiology, diagnosis, and current understanding of the mechanistic drivers of AGS, with particular focus on the roles of allergic effector cells - mast cells (MCs) and basophils. We explore unique clinical characteristics of AGS through the lens of alpha-gal-specific IgE and MC activation in AGS. We propose potential explanations for delayed symptom onset, inconsistent symptom development, and persistence of allergic symptoms in some AGS patients despite removing all mammal products from the diet. RECENT
findingsCurrent evidence implicate bites from hard-bodied ticks as the primary sensitizing agent in AGS. However, there is emerging evidence that other ecto- and endoparasites may also induce alpha-gal-specific IgE. Multiparameter flow and mass cytometry and RNA sequencing have demonstrated an enrichment of unique populations of T, B, invariant natural killer T (iNKT), natural killer B (NKB) and MC progenitor cells in human volunteers with AGS. Recently developed mouse models of AGS will support future studies to identify which cells are critical for the development of AGS. In vitro models of the allergic effector phase of AGS using human sera and novel human alpha-gal-specific IgE monoclonal antibodies in humanized rat allergic effector cell lines, human basophils, human MC lines, and primary human MC cultures, confirm alpha-gal-induced allergic effector cell activation. They also provide a system to study potential alpha-gal-antigen-independent drivers of MC activation in AGS. Efforts are ongoing to understand the epidemiology and immune mechanisms of AGS. Novel reagents (e.g. alpha-gal-specific monoclonal antibodies) and murine AGS models will facilitate deeper investigation of tick-driven, alpha-gal-specific IgE and allergic effector cell-induced pathology in AGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.