Evidence mapPaperPMID 41317289Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025

Bedside ventilatory settings guided by respiratory mechanics in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Davide Chiumello, Silvia Coppola, Pedro Leme Silva, Giulia Lais, Patricia R M Rocco, Lise Piquilloud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Validation of SpOAdvances in respiratory medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Davide ChiumelloSC Anestesia e Rianimazione, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Via Di Rudinì, Milan, Italy. davide.chiumello@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9260-3930
Silvia CoppolaSC Anestesia e Rianimazione, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Via Di Rudinì, Milan, Italy.
Pedro Leme SilvaLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Giulia LaisAdult Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patricia R M Rocco *Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lise Piquilloud *Adult Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventilatory management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requires a careful balance between achieving adequate gas exchange and minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Recent advances in bedside monitoring of respiratory mechanics have created new opportunities to individualize mechanical ventilation by aligning ventilator settings with the patient's dynamic pathophysiology. This review synthesizes current evidence on key respiratory mechanics parameters - such as driving pressure, respiratory system compliance, airway resistance, mechanical power - and examines how they can guide titration of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and respiratory rate. By integrating real-time assessments of respiratory mechanics, clinicians can reduce stress and strain, limit alveolar overdistension and collapse, and optimize oxygenation and ventilation. Moreover, practical strategies are discussed for implementing physiology-guided ventilation in the intensive care unit, with attention to patient-specific characteristics and the heterogeneity of ARDS subphenotypes. Respiratory mechanics-guided ventilation represents a pragmatic, individualized strategy that enhances lung protection, complements established protocols and may contribute to improve survival. Further experimental and clinical studies are required to validate these approaches and translate them into precision medicine for ARDS.

Indexed as

Driving pressureMechanical powerPersonalized mechanical ventilationSubphenotypes

Identifiers

PMID41317289
PMCPMC12664874

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.