ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025
Bedside ventilatory settings guided by respiratory mechanics in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical applications of electrical impedance tomography in pediatric subjects.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Emerging trends and hotspots in lung-protective ventilation from 2006 to 2025: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Vertical Displacement Index and Early Treatment-Related Physiological Improvement in Acute Respiratory Failure: An Exploratory Ultrasound-Based Study.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Observational
- Review
- Validation of SpOAdvances in respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Respiratory physiology after resupination following prone ventilation to predict 28-day mortality in mechanically ventilated patients: a machine learning analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- When mechanical power remains high despite conventional lung-protective settings: a physiology-driven bedside framework.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventilatory management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requires a careful balance between achieving adequate gas exchange and minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Recent advances in bedside monitoring of respiratory mechanics have created new opportunities to individualize mechanical ventilation by aligning ventilator settings with the patient's dynamic pathophysiology. This review synthesizes current evidence on key respiratory mechanics parameters - such as driving pressure, respiratory system compliance, airway resistance, mechanical power - and examines how they can guide titration of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and respiratory rate. By integrating real-time assessments of respiratory mechanics, clinicians can reduce stress and strain, limit alveolar overdistension and collapse, and optimize oxygenation and ventilation. Moreover, practical strategies are discussed for implementing physiology-guided ventilation in the intensive care unit, with attention to patient-specific characteristics and the heterogeneity of ARDS subphenotypes. Respiratory mechanics-guided ventilation represents a pragmatic, individualized strategy that enhances lung protection, complements established protocols and may contribute to improve survival. Further experimental and clinical studies are required to validate these approaches and translate them into precision medicine for ARDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.