ArticleNMR in biomedicine2026
A CSF Background Suppression Scheme in Arterial Spin Labeling MRI.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging Venous Transit Time and Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability of the Deep Brain.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- A CSF Background Suppression Scheme in Arterial Spin Labeling MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI suffers from low signal-to-noise ratio. Current background suppression (BS) methods focus on suppressing tissue signal. The present work aims to test the hypothesis that BS schemes to suppress CSF signal can produce a greater benefit, given the recent observations that water in CSF has more pulsation as part of the neurofluid circulation. We developed a CSF BS scheme that maximally suppresses residual CSF signal using two inversion pulses. Its performance was compared with regular BS and enhanced BS, both of which primarily suppress gray and white matter signals. All schemes were evaluated in single-delay and multi-delay pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) MRI. The single-delay scans assessed cerebral blood flow (CBF), while the multi-delay scans measured both CBF and arterial transit time (ATT). Reproducibility was assessed using voxel-wise coefficient of variation (CoV) and spatial Spearman correlation coefficients (Rs). When using the CSF BS scheme, CSF signals were suppressed to less than 1% of the equilibrium magnetization, with gray and white matter signals around 5% in opposite magnetization signs. Complex control/label subtraction effectively accounted for magnetization signs and obtained the correct difference signal. In single-delay pCASL, CSF BS reduced visually apparent hyper- and hypo-intensity signals in CBF maps, which were present in the tissue-focused regular and enhanced BS schemes. These artifactual signal fluctuations were particularly pronounced in the brain-stem regions where CSF pulsation was the most severe, but also spread along the z-encoding direction. Quantitatively, CSF BS resulted in a lower voxel-wise CoV (8.8%) and higher R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.