ArticleContemporary clinical trials2026
Pilot randomized trial of cash transfer interventions to improve health outcomes in low income adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: Study protocol and baseline characteristics.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMonetary interventions, such as cash transfers, have emerged as important intervention approaches to address the complex determinants at the structural and individual level impacting diabetes outcomes.
methodsThis NIH funded (K01DK131319), pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an ongoing 5 year study to evaluate the efficacy of two diabetes-tailored cash transfer interventions in low-income adults in which 1) cash transfers are conditional on participating in nurse-led, telephone-delivered diabetes education/skills training and stress/coping intervention delivered every 2 weeks for 6 months (DM-CCT); or 2) cash transfers are unconditional (DM-UCT), on clinical outcomes (HbA1c and blood pressure), and quality of life among 100 African Americans aged 18+ years with T2DM and HbA1c ≥8 %. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3-, and 6-months with primary outcome at 6 months post-randomization. DISCUSSION: Recruitment began in March 2023 and was completed in February 2024. Average age was 51 years. Most participants were women (71.0 %). Mean HbA1c was 10.1±1.8 for DM-CCT group and 10.2±1.8 for DM-UCT group. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was 128.0±22.7 mmHg and 80.2±13.7 mmHg for DM-CCT group and 133.5±22.2 mmHg and 83.7±13.7 mmHg for DM-UCT group. Mean BMI was 36.2±10.3 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.