Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41318483›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

A multiple criteria framework for value-based assessment of health care services applied to a radiology case.

Ana Moreira, Nazaré Rego, José Crispim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana MoreiraCentro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.
Nazaré RegoEscola de Economia e Gestão, NIPE, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal.
José CrispimEscola de Economia e Gestão, NIPE, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal. crispim@eeg.uminho.pt.

Funding

PRR_ Agendas/Alianças mobilizadoras para a reindustrialização Pacto de Inovação HfPt (Project C630926586-00465198)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, value-based health care assessment initiatives have: (1) not explicitly evaluated value; (2) been complex (which limits reproducibility) and not admitted customization; and 4) not operationalized value in a way that addresses the concerns of the involved stakeholders. This research developed a four-step framework for value-based assessment of health care services that aims to overcome these limitations. The development of the framework was supported by a case study conducted in the radiology department of the second largest general hospital in Portugal and involved the participation of administrators, physicians, radiographers, and patients, and incorporates several Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis methods. A set of 160 indicators to assess the value of radiology departments was identified in the literature and synthesized into 7 value-assessment dimensions. The framework considers specific indicators for each stakeholder type and suggests customizable ways to determine the benefit of the service. Additionally, we determined the value of the radiology department (considering benefits perceived by stakeholders and direct clinical costs) and propose a dashboard to monitor its evolution. The developed management tool enables an explicit valuation of the department and uncovers service features that need to be improved. If its use is continued, it will report the evolution of the department. The framework can easily be adapted to other hospitals or departments or be used by researchers as a basis for the development of other models.

Indexed as

Radiology Department, HospitalCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansOrganizational Case StudiesPortugalPerformance indicators in radiologyValue assessment frameworkValue-based healthcareValue-based radiology

Identifiers

PMID41318483
PMCPMC12771880

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.