ReviewBioelectronic medicine2025
Predicting response to neuromodulation therapies in drug-resistant epilepsy using machine learning models: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Review in Bioelectronic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify and analyze all the relevant literature regarding the use of machine learning to predict response to neuromodulation therapies in patients diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe systematically search PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases to identify all the studies that used machine learning models to predict response to neuromodulations. Prior to the search, the study was registered at the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42024543952). Quality assessment and risk of bias was done using PROBAST. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled value of the AUROC. A sub-analysis was performed for population-specific scenarios.
resultsA total of 4,451 studies were identified after our initial search, from those, only 12 papers were included in the final analysis. The total number of patients across all the cohorts was 535. 11 studies focused on VNS and only one on ctDCS. Only five out of the 12 studies included an external cohort to validate the results. The most common population was pediatric (n = 7). The most common ML model used was the support vector machine. The pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.84 (95% IC, 079-0.88).
conclusionsOur study suggests that multimodal ML approaches show promising performance in predicting response to neuromodulation strategies in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, the limited number of studies, the scarcity of external validation and small cohorts highlight the need for larger, high-quality prospective investigations to confirm these findings and improve the generalizability of ML-based prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.