ArticleScientific reports2025
Attention-Base deep learning for 3D craniofacial soft tissue landmark detection and diagnosis in orthodontics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence -based modeling and comparative evaluation of craniofacial soft tissue and subcutaneous fat thickness using ct imaging for forensic identification in a northwestern indian population.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial soft tissue analysis is crucial for diagnosing malocclusion and formulating personalized orthodontic treatment plans. However, the automated localization of 3D landmarks is often hindered by complex anatomy and significant biological variability.To address this challenge, we developed an innovative two-stage attention-based deep learning framework for robust landmark detection and diagnostic classification. Our approach leverages PointTransformerV3(PTv3) as its backbone, augmented by two novel modules: a Geodesic Crop module that isolates the facial region via curvature-aware geodesic masking and a Dynamic Landmark Structure Learning module that incorporates anatomical priors to model spatial interdependencies. This integrated architecture significantly enhances localization precision and structural consistency. We evaluated performance of our approach by using three complementary metrics: mean radial error (MRE), successful detection rate (SDR) across clinically relevant thresholds (2-4 mm), and successful classification rate(SCR) for treatment difficulty. Our framework achieved state-of-the-art results, with an MRE of 2.17 ± 1.54 mm (test set) and 2.19 ± 1.60 mm (validation set), alongside high SDR values meeting clinical tolerances. Notably, the model achieved a 91.74% diagnostic accuracy in classifying orthodontic treatment difficulty, underscoring its strong potential for clinical application. Comparative analyses confirmed significant improvements over existing methods in both landmark precision and diagnostic utility. Overall, these results validate the efficacy of our two-stage framework in automating craniofacial morphology assessment. By synergistically integrating geometric cropping, attention mechanisms, and anatomical constraints, the system offers orthodontists a reliable tool to enhance diagnostic precision, optimize treatment planning, and improve outcomes in patients with malocclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.