ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning algorithms and artificial neural networks for predicting schizophrenia using orbital parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A persistent mental illness, schizophrenia has a complicated etiopathogenesis that includes both environmental and genetic elements. This study examined the possibility of diagnosing schizophrenia by utilizing computed tomography (CT) images of the orbit and its structures, which were then examined by artificial neural networks (ANNs) and machine learning (ML) algorithms. A retrospective analysis of the CT scans of 90 healthy people and 90 people with schizophrenia was conducted. Prior to measurement, all CT images underwent preprocessing steps to ensure align-ment and standardization. Height, width, depth, wall length, aperture area, interorbital width, biorbital width, bimalar width, skull transverse diameter, and optic nerve sheath width were among the orbital parameters that were measured. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the groups in left orbital width, left orbital aperture area, right optic nerve sheath width, transverse skull diameter, bimalar width, biorbital width, and left medial wall length. ML algorithms and ANNs were applied to the data, with the Extra Tree Classifier (ETC) algorithm achieving the highest accuracy of 0.78 and the Multilayer Perceptron Classifier (MLCP) model of ANN achieving an accuracy of 0.75 after 1000 training iterations. The Random Forest algorithm's SHAP analyzer determined that the left orbital width had the biggest impact on the final outcome. These results add to the expanding field of machine learning applications in psychiatry by indicating that AI-based models that analyze orbital morphometry may be useful instruments for detecting schizophrenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.