ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpreting epidemiological surveillance data: a modelling study based on Pune city.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Routine epidemiological surveillance data represents one of the most continuous and current sources of data during the course of an epidemic. This data is used to calibrate epidemiological forecasting models, as well as for public health decision making such as the imposition and lifting of lockdowns and quarantine measures. However, such data is generated during testing and contact tracing and not through randomized sampling. Furthermore, since the process of generating this data affects the epidemic trajectory itself – identification of infected persons might lead to them being quarantined, for instance – it is unclear how representative such data is of the actual epidemic itself. For example, will the observed rise in infections correspond well with the actual rise in infections? To answer such questions, we employ epidemiological simulations not to study the effectiveness of different public health strategies in controlling the spread of the epidemic, but to study the quality of the resulting surveillance data and derived metrics and their utility for decision making. Using the BharatSim simulation framework, we build an agent-based epidemiological model with a detailed representation of testing and contact tracing strategies based on those employed in Pune city during the COVID-19 pandemic to generate synthetic surveillance data. Infected persons are identified, quarantined and/or hospitalised based on these strategies. We perform extensive simulations to study the impact of different public health strategies and the availability of tests and contact tracing efficiencies on the resulting surveillance data as well as on the course of the epidemic. The fidelity of the resulting surveillance data in representing the real-time state of the epidemic and in decision-making is explored in the context of Pune city.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.