ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Impact of Evidence-Based Nursing Interventions on Prognosis of Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute cerebral infarction significantly impacts patients' physical, cognitive, and psychological health. Evidence-based nursing (EBN) interventions offer a patient-centered approach to address these multifaceted challenges. This study evaluated the effectiveness of EBN in improving psychological outcomes, cognitive function, independence in daily living, and quality of life in patients with acute cerebral infarction. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on 256 patients with acute cerebral infarction between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were assigned to either the control group (routine care, n=126) or the observation group (EBN care, n=130). Clinical outcomes, including Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Assessment (CMMS), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF) scores, were compared before and after intervention. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 27.0, with significance set at P<0.05. RESULTS The observation group demonstrated significantly greater improvements across all measured outcomes compared to the control group (P<0.05). Post-intervention HAMD and HAMA scores decreased substantially in the observation group, indicating reduced psychological distress. Similarly, CMMS and ADL scores improved markedly, reflecting enhanced cognitive function and greater independence. Quality-of-life scores across physical, social, psychological, and environmental domains were significantly higher in the observation group. CONCLUSIONS EBN interventions significantly improve psychological outcomes, cognitive function, daily living independence, and quality of life in patients with acute cerebral infarction. These findings support the integration of EBN into routine stroke care to optimize patient recovery and overall prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.