ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Modeling approaches for estimating the effects of risk factors using longitudinal lifecourse exposure data in dementia research.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The social environment and cognitive aging over the life course: laying out critical concepts and research gaps.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Longitudinal data on risk factors at different ages across the lifecourse are essential for gaining important insights into how the timing and accumulation of exposure to risk factors influence the risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (dementia). With increased interest in the exposome and lifecourse research questions, there have been commensurate increases in data sources and methodological approaches for answering these questions using empirical data. Methodological approaches developed within specific disciplines have largely remained within disciplinary silos, despite their potential for broader applications. By enumerating these approaches in a single place, we aim to expand discovery in lifecourse dementia research and help investigators align their research questions with appropriate analytic methods. In doing so, we seek to guide methodological decision-making and ensure that researchers use appropriate statistical tools to answer important questions about the exposome and lifecourse risk factors for dementia. HIGHLIGHTS: Longitudinal exposure data are valuable for exposome and lifecourse research on dementia. Multiple methodological approaches exist to analyze such data, with different assumptions, advantages, and disadvantages. Some methodological approaches have been used predominantly in specific disciplines but may have wider utility. Additional research is needed to integrate added complexity from the co-occurrence of multiple exposures into existing methods. Comparisons between methods help researchers make informed decisions on the appropriate method for a specific research question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.