ArticleBMJ open2025
Scholarship of teaching and learning of nursing faculty members: a protocol for a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) is emphasised more than ever in today's higher education institutions. SoTL is crucial in enhancing nursing education and improving student learning outcomes, thereby preparing competent nurses to deliver high-quality healthcare. Despite its importance, the dimensions and defining characteristics of SoTL have not been adequately explored. This scoping review aims to clarify the concept of SoTL in nursing education, identify its key features and address existing knowledge gaps in this field. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study adopts Arksey and O'Malley's established scoping review methodology, as defined by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The research process is guided by five distinct phases: the initial formulation of research questions, identification of relevant studies, selection of studies, data extraction and compilation and, finally, synthesis and reporting of results.The inclusion criteria will be based on the Population, Concept and Context framework. A comprehensive search will be conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, ERIC and grey literature sources, with no time limitations and ongoing updates until the study concludes.To ensure a comprehensive review, reference lists and citations of selected studies will also be examined for additional relevant sources. Duplicate studies and studies published in languages other than Persian or English will be excluded. Two independent reviewers will select studies based on eligibility criteria and screen the title, abstract and full text. Data extraction will be conducted using the standard JBI form. A directed content analysis will be undertaken to identify and clarify key concepts in the texts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Research Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences has approved this study. The results will be published in scientific publications and presented at relevant conferences. STUDY REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VN5GD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.