Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321404›Full record

ArticleMetabolism open2025

Probiotics,

Neda Shalbaf, Soheila Sadeghi, Sina Homaee, Farnaz Saberian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolism open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neda ShalbafDepartment of Internal Medicine, Imam Hossein Educational Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Soheila SadeghiDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sina HomaeeDepartment of Internal Medicine Ward, Chronic Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farnaz SaberianDepartment of Internal Medicine, Imam Hossein Educational Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and related dysglycemia, and to synthesize associated mechanistic changes in microbial metabolites and composition. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through August 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with T2D, prediabetes, or metabolic syndrome. Interventions included probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, or FMT compared to control. Outcomes were glycemic indices (e.g., HbA1c, HOMA-IR) and mechanistic biomarkers (e.g., SCFAs, bile acids). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. A narrative synthesis was performed. Results: Thirty studies were included. Multi-strain probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics yielded modest but significant improvements in HbA1c (≈-0.2 to -0.4 %), fasting glucose, and HOMA-IR, particularly with durations ≥12 weeks. These benefits were linked to mechanistic shifts, including increased circulating butyrate and ursodeoxycholate, enrichment of SCFA-producing taxa, and reduced endotoxemia. Efficacy was moderated by concomitant medications: metformin use was synergistic, while sulfonylureas attenuated effects. FMT consistently improved clamp-measured insulin sensitivity in insulin-resistant phenotypes, but its effects on HbA1c were less consistent and donor-dependent. Conclusion: Microbiome-targeted interventions, especially multi-strain probiotics and substrate-matched synbiotics, are effective adjuncts for improving glycemic control, with effects mediated through microbial metabolite production. FMT primarily modulates insulin sensitivity. Clinical outcomes are context-dependent, influenced by intervention design, duration, and pharmacomicrobiomic interactions.

Indexed as

Fecal microbiota transplantationGlycemic controlMicrobiomeProbioticsType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41321404
PMCPMC12664430

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.