ReviewAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Incidence of Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia After Cryolipolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paradoxical adipose hyperplasia (PAH) is a rare complication of cryolipolysis, characterized by an unexpected overgrowth of adipocytes in the treatment area. Emerging literature suggests that PAH may be underrecognized and underreported. Because of the increasing popularity of cryolipolysis for nonsurgical fat reduction, we sought to identify the overall incidence of PAH as well as the incidence by sex and treatment device, time to diagnosis, and any additional complications of cryolipolysis. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL) were searched from inception to May 11, 2025, for studies reporting on PAH incidence in cryolipolysis patients. The primary outcome was the literature-pooled PAH incidence, estimated using a nonpairwise generalized linear mixed model for meta-analysis. Secondarily, we descriptively reviewed treatment devices utilized, time to PAH diagnosis, and additional cryolipolysis complications. Twenty-eight studies encompassing 13,078 patients were included in the review. Low-certainty evidence suggested that the pooled incidence of PAH was 0.22% (95% CI, 0.10-0.47), with 29 cases identified (1 in 455 patients). Sex-based risk differences were not statistically significant. Only 4 studies reported sufficient follow-up duration (≥16 weeks). PAH cases were reported with various devices and applicators, and although 10 of the 29 PAH cases (34.5%) involved the CoolCore applicator, insufficient data precluded device-based meta-analysis. Overall, the incidence of PAH following cryolipolysis appears to be higher than manufacturer reports. These findings emphasize the need for comprehensive risk disclosure, improved awareness and adverse event reporting, risk factor identification, and further investigation into the pathogenesis of PAH. Level of Evidence: 3 (Therapeutic).
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.