ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025
Engineering neural recovery: Micro/nano-structured materials for nerve regeneration.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A diameter-adaptive, suture-free conduit with magnetoelectric responsiveness promotes peripheral nerve regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- In Vivo Evaluation of Conductive Biopolymer-Based 3D Bioprinted Nerve Conduit in Sciatic Nerve Injury Repair.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- Functional and Morphological Outcomes of Duration-Dependent Electrical Stimulation in Silicone Conduit-Mediated Peripheral Nerve Repair in Rats.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exosome Augmentation Technologies for Drug Delivery and Disease Treatment: A Review.Biomaterials research · 2026Review
- A Bio-Inspired Artificial Nerve Simulator for Ex Vivo Validation of Implantable Neural Interfaces Equipped with Plug Electrodes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Micro- and nano-structures play a crucial role in modulating nerve cell behavior and influencing the distribution of endogenous factors or exogenous therapeutic agents, which significantly affect the outcome of nerve tissue regeneration. Herein, the development of micro/nano-structured materials for neural tissue regeneration is reviewed. Also, the main manufacturing strategies of micro- and nano-structures are introduced, including electrospinning, 3D printing, microfluidics, and freezing casting. Particularly, multiple micro/nano-structured materials and their applications in both peripheral nerve and spinal cord injury repair are highlighted. Furthermore, the challenges and prospects of micro/nano-structured materials for nerve regeneration are presented and discussed. Finally, the challenges and outlook for developing the next-generation structured materials are summarized. This review provides helpful knowledge and inspires researchers with more promising ideas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.