Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322357›Full record

ReviewCancer pathogenesis and therapy2026

Emerging risk factors and the role of gut microbiota in immunomodulation and therapeutic implications in colorectal cancer.

Sonakshi Modeel, Sneha Siwach, Padma Dolkar, Meenu Chaurasia, Pankaj Yadav, Apoorva Atri, Aarzoo Yadav, Tarana Negi, Ram Krishan Negi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer pathogenesis and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Application ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sonakshi ModeelFish Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India.
Sneha SiwachFish Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India.
Padma DolkarFish Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India.
Meenu ChaurasiaFish Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India.
Pankaj YadavFish Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India.
Apoorva AtriFish Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India.
Aarzoo YadavFish Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India.
Tarana NegiGovernment College, Kharkhoda, District Sonipat, Haryana, 124102, India.
Ram Krishan NegiFish Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of many ailments, including neurological, gastrointestinal, and metabolic problems, is well known to be influenced by intestinal dysbiosis. Clinical research has provided evidence suggesting a strong correlation between dysbiosis of the gut microbiome and colorectal cancer (CRC) development. The active reprogramming of metabolic pathways to boost glycolysis, fatty acid production, lipogenesis, and glutaminolysis constitutes a major metabolic shift in cancer development, including CRC. The complex combination of different factors leads to CRC, making it an environmental disease. These factors include food and lifestyle choices, genetics and family history, age, underlying intestinal diseases, and dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. One of the primary risk factors for carcinoma development is diet, which impacts an individual's gut microbiome. In addition to impacting CRC formation, the gut microbiome also has immunomodulatory effects, including various immunological interactions and the underlying mechanisms governing them. Microbial interactions in CRC have been extensively studied, yet numerous unresolved queries exist on how gut bacteria can influence treatment. It is possible to perform microbiome-driven immunotherapies focusing on probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. However, large-scale treatment utilization in CRC patients is limited by several issues, including variations in the microbial makeup of each patient's gut and a lack of established methods. The study highlights the impact of several risk factors, including dysbiosis of the gut microbiome and different approaches to halting and treating CRC progression with a focus on diet changes and modulation of the gut flora. Given the foregoing, we propose that if research gaps are addressed and immunotherapy is paired with microbial interventions, microbiota-based therapeutics could potentially impede the growth of tumors and treat CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerCRC therapyGastrointestinal microbiomeImmunomodulationProbioticsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41322357
PMCPMC12662106

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.