ReviewACS omega2025
Engineering Osteosarcoma In Vitro: From Traditional Models to Biofabricated Platforms for Precision Medicine.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Bone-Mimetic Microspheres to Recapitulate the Tumor Microenvironment for In Vitro Osteosarcoma Modeling.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Precision oncology in the treatment of patients with bone sarcomas: an up-to-date narrative review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Modeling and targeting the hostile physicochemical niche in bone metastasis: from experimental platforms to niche-directed therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Integrative biomarker and drug target discovery in osteosarcoma: traditional experimental approaches and AI-enabled insights.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma is a highly malignant primary bone tumor that predominantly affects adolescents. Despite the widespread application of standard treatment modalities, including surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, the long-term survival rate of patients remains unsatisfactory due to the high metastatic potential and drug resistance of the disease. In recent years, researchers have focused on developing more precise in vitro models that aim to better simulate the tumor microenvironment, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of drug screening and personalized therapy. This review summarizes the latest advances in osteosarcoma in vitro modeling, including the development of conventional two-dimensional culture systems, three-dimensional culture platforms, organoid models, and microfluidic chips designed to mimic the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, this review explores the application value of these models in drug screening, immune coculture systems, and personalized treatment strategies. The integration of multiomics data and artificial intelligence is also discussed as a means to optimize model design and facilitate precision oncology. Biomimetic in vitro models have the potential to more accurately replicate tumor heterogeneity, cell-cell interactions, and the complexity of the tumor microenvironment, thereby increasing the translational value of preclinical drug development. Finally, this review highlights the current challenges in the field, including the lack of standardized protocols, issues with model stability and reproducibility, and the practical integration of these models into preclinical research pipelines.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.