ArticleFrontiers in radiology2025
Synthetic CT generation from CBCT using deep learning for adaptive radiotherapy in prostate cancer.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In this study, the accuracy of deep learning-based models developed for synthetic CT (sCT) generation from conventional Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images of prostate cancer patients was evaluated. The clinical applicability of these sCTs in treatment planning and their potential to support adaptive radiotherapy decision-making were also investigated. Methods: A total of 50 CBCT-CT mappings were obtained for each of 10 retrospectively selected prostate cancer patients, including one planning CT (pCT) and five CBCT scans taken on different days during the treatment process. All images were preprocessed, anatomically matched and used as input to the U-Net and ResU-Net models trained with PyTorch after z-score normalisation. The sCT outputs obtained from model outputs were quantitatively compared with the pCT with metrics such as SSIM, PSNR, MAE, and HU difference distribution. Results: Both models produced sCT images with higher similarity to pCT compared to CBCT images. The mean SSIM value was 0.763 ± 0.040 for CBCT-CT matches, 0.840 ± 0.026 with U-Net and 0.851 ± 0.026 with ResU-Net, with a significant increase in both models ( Conclusion: Deep learning models trained with simple architectures such as U-Net and ResU-Net provide effective and feasible solutions for the generation of clinically relevant sCT from CBCT images, supporting accurate dose calculation and facilitating adaptive radiotherapy workflows in prostate cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.