ArticleCureus2025
Prostatic Abscess in a 45-Year-Old Male: Atypical Presentation and Successful Management With Open Transperineal Drainage.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A prostatic abscess is a rare but serious urological emergency that requires prompt recognition and intervention due to associated risks of urosepsis, multi-organ failure, and death. This case describes a previously healthy 45-year-old male who experienced delayed diagnosis and management of a complex prostatic abscess following multiple encounters with secondary care services. Imaging revealed a prostatic abscess with atypical features, including multiloculation and extension into the ischiorectal fossa and gluteal region. Given the extensive nature of the infection and preoperative signs of sepsis, emergency drainage was performed through an unconventional transperineal open approach in a joint procedure between Urology and General Surgery. This method was selected because aspiration alone, although considered the first-line approach for prostatic abscess drainage, was unlikely to provide adequate drainage given the multiloculated and extensive nature of the abscess. As no underlying cause for abscess formation was identified during inpatient admission, the patient underwent a comprehensive outpatient evaluation following acute management. This follow-up included detailed biochemical and clinical assessments, coupled with thorough history-taking, to identify any missed risk factors. This case underscores several key considerations for clinical practice, including the importance of early imaging to guide management, guideline-directed antibiotic therapies, robust follow-up and safety-netting systems, and timely multidisciplinary collaboration. It also demonstrates that an open transperineal drainage approach serves as a safe and effective treatment for atypical abscesses when conventional transurethral, transrectal, or minimally invasive transperineal methods are likely to be inadequate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.