Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322911›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Imaging in Acute Abdominal Emergencies: A Narrative Review of Surgical Decision-Making and Outcomes.

Satabdi Dutta, Ovijit Dey, Sumit Midya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Satabdi DuttaGeneral Practice, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, GBR.
Ovijit DeyGeneral Medicine, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, GBR.
Sumit MidyaGeneral Surgery, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute abdominal pain remains a common cause of emergency presentations, and modern imaging has transformed its evaluation and management. The introduction of ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is generally believed to have improved diagnostic accuracy, reducing unnecessary surgical exploration and enabling safer, more targeted interventions. This review summarizes current evidence on the role of imaging in conditions such as appendicitis, trauma, diverticulitis, and bowel obstruction, highlighting its impact on surgical outcomes and clinical pathways. Key issues include balancing diagnostic speed with concerns over radiation exposure, cost, and potential overuse, particularly in vulnerable populations. Emerging technologies such as low-dose CT, artificial intelligence, and point-of-care imaging are likely to further refine practice, while addressing global disparities in access remains an ongoing challenge. This review uniquely synthesizes recent guideline updates and outcome-based evidence to highlight how modern imaging has redefined surgical decision-making in acute abdominal emergencies.

Indexed as

abdominal injuries/diagnostic imagingabdominal pain/diagnostic imagingacute diseaseappendicitis/diagnostic imagingdiverticulitis/diagnostic imagingintestinal obstruction/diagnostic imagingtomography x-ray computedultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41322911
PMCPMC12658405

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.