Evidence mapPaperPMID 41322927Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Towards Gut Microbiota Among Undergraduate Students of Health Sciences in a Tertiary Care Center, Tamil Nadu.

Yasmin M, Sangeetha Munuswamy, Revathi Murugesan, Shreeram Astic Deshpande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yasmin MMicrobiology, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, IND.
Sangeetha MunuswamyMicrobiology, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, IND.
Revathi MurugesanAnatomy, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, IND.
Shreeram Astic DeshpandeMicrobiology, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Gut health roughly entails all factors that sustain the normal physiology of the gastrointestinal system. Factors like food habits, extensive antibiotic misuse have profound effects on the compositional balance of gut microbiota, thereby compromising its beneficial effects on gut health. The interplay of these factors has certainly placed the younger generation at risk of developing non-communicable diseases. Objectives To assess the knowledge of undergraduate health science students by the Microbiota Awareness Scale, and attitude and practices of health science students regarding gut microbiota and their significance with course of study. Methodology Our study was a cross-sectional descriptive study. Knowledge, attitude and practices towards gut microbiota were collected by a questionnaire using Google Forms from all participants. The questionnaire contained demographic details like age, gender, course and year of study and questions regarding knowledge, attitude and practices towards gut health. Knowledge was assessed using a prevalidated Microbiota Awareness Scale; attitude and practices using a validated self-structured questionnaire. Data were entered in an Excel sheet (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and results were analyzed using SPSS software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Our study had 902 participants who responded to the questionnaire which included 410 undergraduate medical students, 155 allied health science students of Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu and 337 nursing students of Karpagam Nursing College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Around half of the participants (n=463, 51.33%) had adequate knowledge and the remaining (n=439, 48.66%) participants had inadequate knowledge. Nearly half of the participants (n=449, 49.77%) had a positive attitude, 234 (25.94%) participants had a neutral attitude and the remaining 219 (24.27%) participants had a negative attitude towards probiotics and prebiotics. Four hundred ninety-seven (55.09%) participants engage in practices that support a good gut microbiota, 267 (29.60%) participants engage in habits that neither benefit nor harm their gut microbiota and 138 (15.29%) participants engage in habits that negatively impact their gut microbiota. Conclusion Half of the surveyed population had adequate understanding of gut microbiota and the remaining participants had inadequate knowledge on gut microbiota. Almost the same proportion of participants who had adequate knowledge also have positive attitudes and hence exhibit behaviors that support good gut health. This study emphasizes that bridging the knowledge gap would promote better attitudes and practices towards factors that influence gut microbiota and instigate a change in behavioral patterns towards gut health preservation.

Indexed as

attitudegut healthknowledgemicrobiota awarenessnon communicable diseasespractices

Identifiers

PMID41322927
PMCPMC12659813

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.