ArticleBiology methods & protocols2025
Validation of a personalized AI prompt generator (NExGEN-ChatGPT) for obesity management using fuzzy Delphi method.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Generated Exercise Prescriptions for At-Risk Populations: Safety and Feasibility of a Large Language Model Assessed by Expert Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Real-World Nutrition Assessment: Structured Prompts, Multi-Model Validation and Expert Oversight.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to personalize dietary and exercise advice for obesity management is increasingly evident. However, the effectiveness and appropriateness of AI-generated recommendations hinge significantly on input quality and structured guidance. Despite growing interest, there remains a notable gap regarding a robust and validated prompt-generation mechanism designed explicitly for obesity-related lifestyle planning. This study aimed to evaluate and refine the quality of a personalized AI-driven framework (NExGEN-ChatGPT) for dietary and exercise prescriptions in obese adults, employing the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) to capture and integrate expert consensus. A multidisciplinary expert panel, comprising 21 professionals from nutrition, medicine, psychology, fitness, and AI domains, was engaged in this study. Using structured questionnaires, the experts systematically assessed and refined six primary constructs, further detailed into several evaluative elements, resulting in the consensus validation of 111 specific criteria. Findings identified critical consensus-driven standards essential for personalized, safe, and feasible obesity management through AI. Moreover, the study revealed prioritized criteria pivotal for maintaining practical relevance, safety, and high-quality personalized recommendations. Consequently, this validated framework provides a substantial foundation for subsequent real-world application and further research, thereby enhancing the effectiveness, scalability, and individualization of obesity interventions leveraging AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.