ArticlePulmonary circulation2025
A Systematic Literature Review Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil and Sildenafil in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sildenafil in bronchopulmonary dysplasia-associated pulmonary hypertension: developmental and translational insights.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Article
- A Systematic Literature Review Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil and Sildenafil in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- Preparation and Evaluation of Tadalafil-Loaded Nanoemulgel for Transdermal Delivery in Cold-Induced Vasoconstriction: A Potential Therapy for Raynaud's Phenomenon.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is a rare, chronic and progressive disease affecting the heart and lungs. Endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) + phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) treatment is recommended for all PAH patients. The two approved PDE5is are tadalafil and sildenafil. To determine the efficacy and safety outcomes for tadalafil and sildenafil as monotherapies or in combination with ERAs for treating PAH, from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence studies (RWEs) identified by a systematic literature review (SLR). MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Libraries were searched in May 2024. Relevant outcomes included 6-min walk distance (6MWD), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and safety. This report includes studies where patients were treated with either sildenafil or tadalafil. Fifteen RCTs and three RWEs investigated tadalafil (tadalafil 40 mg or 20 mg once daily) or sildenafil (20 mg three times a day). Mean 6MWD change from baseline (CFB) in patients receiving tadalafil or sildenafil monotherapy were comparable, however, in combination with an ERA, tadalafil may be more effective. Generally, there was more data for tadalafil + ERAs, showing marked improvement in mean PVR CFB, compared with patients receiving sildenafil. Conclusions on safety were limited. Risk of bias in RCTs was generally low but moderate in RWEs. Two studies reported patients who switched from sildenafil to tadalafil treatment, treatment transition was feasible. Although comparable when used as monotherapy, this qualitative analysis suggests that tadalafil + ERA combination therapy may have more favorable 6MWD improvements than sildenafil + ERA combination therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.