ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025
A real-world data challenge: guidance for aligning data privacy compliance and fit-for-purpose usability.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing use of real-world data (RWD), particularly from electronic health records (EHRs), has heightened the need for careful attention to data privacy, utility, and transparency. We examine the complex processes involved in curating privacy-compliant EHR-derived RWD, highlighting key de-identification considerations and techniques. We emphasize the importance of aligning curation practices with privacy laws and regulations, with a particular focus on the comprehensive documentation of de-identification techniques. Such documentation should reflect intended data use, accessibility, availability, accuracy, and granularity. For researchers, greater transparency in these practices can improve compliance and lead to more robust and reliable real-world evidence. For policymakers, it provides a foundation to develop more specific and actionable guidelines and oversight mechanisms. Ultimately, highly transparent curation process enhances the reliability of RWD and supports rigorous, nuanced, and informed decision-making across the health care ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.