ArticleInflammatory intestinal diseases
Fecal Calprotectin Levels in Post-Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Patients: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Inflammatory intestinal diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fecal calprotectin (FCP) is a key biomarker for gastrointestinal inflammation, aiding in differentiating irritable bowel syndrome from active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Metabolic bariatric surgeries (MBSs), such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy, alter gastrointestinal physiology, potentially affecting the applicability of standard FCP cutoff values in this population. Methods: This retrospective study included 340 patients who underwent MBS and subsequent FCP testing between January 2000 and June 2024. Patients with preoperative IBD were excluded. The primary outcome was to identify the optimal FCP cutoff values for relevant colonoscopy findings. Secondary outcomes included median FCP levels, colonoscopy results, and subgroup analyses based on sex, surgery type, and time to gastrointestinal evaluation. Results: The median FCP level across all patients was 51 µg/g (IQR 30-82). Among 124 patients undergoing colonoscopy, the median FCP was 61 µg/g (IQR 34-104). There was no significant difference between patients with (69.5 µg/g, Conclusion: In patients following MBS, the optimal FCP cutoff value would be at 59.5 µg/g. However, given the low Youden's index and the minimal difference compared to the standard cutoff value of 50 µg/g, maintaining this standard, seems more practical in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.