Evidence mapPaperPMID 41323588Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Access, awareness, and risk: drivers of unsafe sharps disposal and needle reuse in insulin-treated adults in China.

Shaoping Wu, Fang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaoping WuDepartment of Endocrinology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, Hubei, China.
Fang WangDepartment of Outpatient, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Unsafe household sharps disposal and needle reuse among insulin-treated adults pose clinical and public health risks; however, population-based data from China are limited. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of consecutive insulin-treated outpatients at a tertiary hospital in Enshi, Hubei (February 2023-December 2024). A cross-culturally adapted questionnaire captured 30-day disposal and reuse practices, community-safety incidents, and access determinants. Primary outcomes were unsafe disposal (household trash, public bins, or toilets/sinks) and any needle reuse. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 1,810 insulin-treated adults, unsafe sharps disposal was widespread (59.0%; 95% CI: 56.7-61.2%). Disposal methods included loose trash at 43.5%, public bins at 15.9%, and approved containers at 24.7%. Needle reuse was reported by 32.5% (95% CI: 30.4-34.7%); among reusers ( Conclusion: Unsafe disposal and needle reuse are prevalent and exhibit strong socioeconomic gradients. Targeted education, container provision, and accessible take-back programs may improve patient and community safety in China.

Indexed as

Equipment ReuseHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInsulinMedical Waste DisposalNeedlesNeedlestick InjuriesAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesInsulinMedical Waste DisposalChinacommunity safetyinsulin injectionneedle reusesharps disposaltake-back programs

Identifiers

PMID41323588
PMCPMC12657182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.