Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323876›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026

A multimodal individualized long-term intervention to prevent functional decline after stroke (LAST-long): a single blinded randomised controlled trial.

Torunn Askim, Sara Rise Langlo, Elin Bergh, Øystein Døhl, Hanne Ellekjær, Anne Hokstad, Håkon Ihle-Hansen, Bent Indredavik, Stian Lydersen, Geske Luzum and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03859063 (A Multimodal Individualized Intervention to Prevent Functional Decline After Stroke. A Randomized Controlled Trial on Long-term Follow-up After Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03859063 nacompletednot on this map

A Multimodal Individualized Intervention to Prevent Functional Decline After Stroke. A Randomized Controlled Trial on Long-term Follow-up After Stroke (The LAST-long Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2019 to 2024Enrolled301ConditionsStrokeArmsIntervention, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Torunn AskimDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Sara Rise LangloDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Elin BerghDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Øystein DøhlDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Hanne EllekjærDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Anne HokstadDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Håkon Ihle-HansenDepartment of Medical Research, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway.
Bent IndredavikDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Stian LydersenDepartment of Mental Health, Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Geske LuzumDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Yngve SeljesethDepartment of Medicine, Ålesund Hospital, Helse Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.
Toril SkandsenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Ingvild SaltvedtDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Bente ThommessenDivision of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Akershus, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the lack of evidence, the Stroke Action Plan for Europe recommends coordinated support after initial rehabilitation. This trial investigated if a coordinator-led multimodal intervention was superior to standard care in preventing dependency and functional decline after stroke. Methods: In this single blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial, patients were consecutively screened, included and randomised (1:1) by a web-based randomization system to an intervention or a control group at the out-patient clinics at four Norwegian hospitals three months post-stroke. Blinded assessments were performed at inclusion and at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up. The inclusion criteria were; age ≥18 years, life expectancy ≥12 months (assessed by the physician), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score <5, vulnerable to functional decline (defined by other measures). The control group received standard care, while the intervention group additionally received monthly follow-up by a community-based stroke coordinator who applied a study specific checklist to identify the patients' risk profile within multiple domains. Individual goals and action points were defined accordingly. The intervention lasted for 18 months. Mixed models were used to evaluate differences between the groups for the primary endpoint (mRS at 18-month follow-up) and secondary endpoints (activities of daily living, cognitive function, physical function, patient reported outcomes, physical activity, blood pressure, body mass index and blood tests) at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03859063. The trial has been completed. Findings: The LAST-long trial was conducted from April 11, 2019 to August 28, 2024. In total, 301 participants (48% women); mean age 71·3 (SD 12·3) years, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale admission score 3·38 (SD 4·21), and mRS at inclusion 1·6 (SD 0·9), were randomised to the intervention (n = 152) or control (n = 149) group 108.0 (SD 18·5) days post stroke. The number of serious adverse events (deaths, hospitalisation due to cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events or fall with or without fracture) was 32 (21·1%) in the intervention group and 33 (22·1%) in the control group. At 18 months, the estimated difference between the groups was 0·03 (95% CI: -0·16 to 0·22), p = 0·79 for mRS. Interpretation: The 18-month multimodal intervention was not superior to standard care received by the control group in people with mild stroke. An even longer follow-up period might be needed to investigate the effect of the intervention on hard outcomes like death or recurrent vascular events. Funding: The Research Council of Norway, The Joint Research Committee between St. Olavs Hospital and the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU (FFU), Foundation Dam.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular diseaseCommunitybased interventionComplex interventionHealth CareLong-term follow-upMixed modelsMultimodal interventionSecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID41323876
PMCPMC12662110

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.